|
JEAN SHIN

-
Jean Shin,
Armed, 2005
-
Fabric
(military uniforms from US soldiers), thread and starch
-
Wall 24 x 14
feet, Hanging piece 24 x 6 x 2 feet
-
Installation
view in exhibition Fear Gear at Roebling Hall, New York City
-
Courtesy the
artist and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
John LeKay: The scale of your piece entitled "Armed" is very
striking. It's approximately 24ft by 14ft high. The
accompanying hanging sculptural piece is also of the same scale
length wise, more or less. There seems to be a methodical
element to this piece as well as your other work. How important
is the process of finding materials to make your work and how do
you usually go about doing this?
Jean Shin: The process
of accumulating
my materials is an
extremely significant part
of my work. In each project, I’m bringing together diverse
individuals within a community that are connected by a common
material they all
have in their lives.
In the piece Armed, I
worked
with the director of Harbor Defense Museum at Fort Hamilton,
Paul Morando to find
soldiers who would be interested in donating their uniforms for
my project. It was extremely helpful to have a
member of
the community support the project
and become an informal collaborator. In many cases, I traveled
all over the New York area
to pick
up the uniforms.
This process gave me the
opportunity to personally meet
many of
the soldiers
and hear their stories. The
conversations I had
with soldiers in the Army,
Airforce, Navy, Coast Guard, Reserves and Vets
were interesting
parts
of my research.
They told me
what wearing their uniforms means to them
and shared their experiences
of serving in the military.
JL: What was the experience like of meeting all the soldiers
and hearing their stories; and what were their responses to
seeing the finished piece?
JS. I was pleasantly surprised by my encounters
with the many individuals
who have
served in the military. Many
older vets were very
emotional when
describing their experiences,
especially if they remembered a close buddy
whom
they
had lost during combat.
Some of the military personnel I spoke
with
wear their uniforms with great pride;
yet at the same time they
are extremely critical of the
current administration’s role in
Iraq. Several reserves who
were in Iraq on
peace-keeping
missions
felt a great sense of purpose and yet
struggled with
the complex reality of their
military
presence there.
The notion of camouflage in relationship to today’s military
fascinates
me. In most situations today, the United States’ so-called
‘military presence’ is about visibility--the exact opposite
function that camouflage was designed for.
And
yet the uniforms still
bear the
camouflage
pattern—one meant to hide, blend in and obscure.
Military uniforms have a “dehumanizing” quality to them
as well.
On the one hand, they
take away a person’s individuality,
but on the other
they also function as a blank
canvas onto which
individuals can project
their different, and even contradictory,
beliefs and opinions. For
example, many Americans may view military uniforms as positive
symbols of patriotism, leadership, and sacrifice. The same
uniforms may evoke
negative connotations of power,
fear, and terror for others.
I think those soldiers who
were
willing to take the
time to donate their uniforms to an
art project are a select group of very open-minded and generous
individuals. Overall they were very touched that I took an
interest in them
and excited that there was a
place
where their old uniforms would have a second purpose. The
soldiers who saw the installation were
enthusiastic as they tried
to identify which pieces came from
their own
uniforms—it
was a very personal
experience
for them. They responded very
positively and felt proud to have contributed to an art work.
JL. I sense something else about this piece - the way the
uniforms are cut and pasted like camouflaged wall paper.
Also, the way the hanging sculptural piece resembles a hovering
helicopter made out of camouflaged shreds. It is as if you have
deliberately stripped the uniforms of their symbolism and power
by re -contextualizing the camouflaged costumes in an artistic
and conspicuous way. Was this a part of your intention and does
it relate to when you said, "so-called 'military presence' is
about visibility--the exact opposite function that camouflage
was designed for…yet
the uniforms still bear the
camouflage
pattern—one meant to hide, blend in and obscure."
JS. I’m definitely thinking about wallpaper. Both wallpaper
and camouflage address issues of visibility—creating an
environment in which
a figure becomes
integral to and even sometimes
indistinguishable from
its surroundings.
I was also fascinated by the close
historic relationship between camouflage and landscape that
seems to be inherent in the colors.
My installation moves from greens (jungle
and vegetation) to dark
blues (water), to beiges and browns (desert and earth), then to
pale blue and grey (sky)—the piece
as a whole suggests the
various striations of a military landscape.
For me, the
hanging piece brings to mind
military nets or tents.
But I’m always interested to hear the
different associations that viewers have with my work--each
interpretation bringing something new to it, creating a personal
experience for each individual.

-
Jean Shin,
Chemical Balance, 2005
-
Prescription
bottles, mirror and epoxy
-
Dimensions
Variable
-
Courtesy the
artist and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
JL. How did you collect all the bottles to make "Chemical
Balance"?
When I was working on Chemical Balance, I sent
out emails to everyone I knew asking them to participate in the
project by donating their emptied prescription pill bottles. In
the beginning of the collection
process, I found it
difficult to convince people to participate because of the
sensitivity of the information on these
Rx pill bottles. I
encouraged people to cross out any personal data or remove the
labels to get around this problem. My
New York
gallery
Frederieke Taylor
and venues where the work would be
shown (Sculpture Center and the University Art Museum in Albany)
helped to spread the word and both
served as drop off points
for several months. I also received hundreds of Rx vials from
local pharmacies
and nursing homes. Everyday at the studio I would get packages
from individuals sending me their emptied pill
vials.
Throughout the process,
it was amazing to have so many conversations with people about
their health and their dependency, temporary or long term,
on
prescription drugs
JL. Like your other work, there are many interpretations and
associations that one can make. In the case of Chemical
Balance, could one of them be a social commentary on our
culture's dependency, excessive use of pharmaceuticals and magic
bullet mentality?
JS. That’s a great interpretation of Chemical Balance.
I’m amazed by the effectiveness of pharmaceutical drugs to
alter the chemical balance of our body,
whether for temporary relief or lifelong
dependencies.
Perhaps
we live in a consumer society that is over medicated,
always in search of the
instant cure. At the same time, for many whose
well-beings
are chemically dependent on these drugs,
it’s a love-hate
relationship of dependency--a
constant battle between gratitude and resentment.

-
Jean Shin and
Brian Ripel, Glasscape, 2005
-
Wine bottles
and silicone
-
Dimensions
Variable
-
Courtesy of
the Artist and Eric Dupont Gallery, Paris
-
-

Detail of
Glassscape
JL. What inspired the
"Glasscape" piece you
collaborated on with architect Brian Ripel? Also where did you
get all the wine bottles from and do you have any anecdotes
about the collecting or installation process?
JS. Glasscape was a variation on a project we did in
2003
at Smack Mellon Gallery in New York called Glass Block.
At that particular time, the
government had stopped its
recycling program
in New York City. Each evening
after enjoying a bottle of wine during dinner, my husband
Brian and I were discussing
how disappointing it was that the city couldn’t find a good way
to re-use
this material. What could we
do with glass wine bottles--transforming
both their purpose
and properties? When Smack Mellon
invited us to make a work for the exhibition, we decided to take
on that challenge with this
question in mind. We
decided to block up the entrance of the gallery with a wall of
stacked wine bottles. This gesture redirects the path of the
viewers
and offers them a different experience
of the
gallery’s architectural space.
When they arrive on the opposite
side,
the blocked opening appears more like
a
colorful stained
glass window filled with light.
In Paris, we recognized
just how integral
wine is to
the cultural heritage
as well as the physical
landscape of France. In Glasscape
(2005), the installation
reveals the underlying beauty of this familiar object when
amassed, while suggesting a luminous landscape of glass. The
bottles---emptied and cleaned—had
been collected from neighborhood restaurants and bars in Paris.
My Paris
gallery dealer
Eric Dupont
collected the bottles months in
advance from his friends who own wine bars and restaurants.
Others came from his personal consumption. The flat bottoms of
the bottles became
a translucent
mosaic
of dynamic
circular patterns,
transmitting
various pixels of colored light into the gallery; while the
protruding bottle necks, wrapped in
colorful labels on the opposite side,
appear as an impenetrable, opaque obstruction. The French
audience was very interested in reading the labels on the bottles.
Their commenting on the
name, region and year of each
bottle was surprising to me since this hadn’t been the case in
New York.

-
Jean Shin,
Chance City, 2001-2004
-
$21,496 worth
of discarded lottery tickets (no adhesive)
-
6 x 8 x 8
feet, Installation at Brooklyn Museum
-
Courtesy the
artist and Frederieke Taylor Gallery, New York
-

Chance
City, 2005
-
$21,496 worth of discarded lottery tickets (no
adhesive), 6 x 8 x 8 feet
-
Installation at Brooklyn Museum
JL. "Chance City" looks like a very challenging installation,
since you used no adhesive. Did you attain the tickets in
various stacks of color and did you actually calculate the
$21,496 worth of discarded lottery tickets yourself?
JS.
While all my work is labor-intensive,
Chance City
in particular is a piece that is
especially so. All the
lottery tickets are scratched-off
tickets that I accumulated
from several vendors over a couple of years.
Once I had collected thousands of them in
my studio, I organized them according to color and counted the
exact dollar amount of each stack. During the on-site
installation, it takes me several days to build the towers like
a house of cards.
I wanted the sculpture to have similar issues of risk and chance
that are two factors integral to
playing the lottery. The
cards are held up
by
both gravity and friction,
remaining vulnerable to
chance and the possibility that the towers
could
fall. I like to think
that the installation is
held together by pure human desire,
just as the daily ritual of
playing the lotto comes out of the fantasy of winning a million
dollars instantly. Unfortunately, the reality is just the
opposite—hundreds
and thousands of dollars lost in
wishful thinking.
-
Jean
Shin, Penumbra, 2003
-
Fabric
(broken umbrellas) and thread, 72 x 45 x variable height
-
Installation at Socrates Sculpture Park, Long Island
City, NY
JL.
In Penumbra, was
there anything in particular that sparked the making this piece
and where did you find all the umbrellas?
JS. I remember walking in New York after a heavy rain storm
and seeing dozens of broken umbrellas abandoned on the street.
After
the storm had
passed,
I started to rescue these
tragic objects.
In New York in particular, we use an abundant amount of cheap
black and dark umbrellas—it seems like they’re
in fact
designed for this
very
kind of casual
disposability. I wanted to
re-introduce the umbrellas back to the outdoor elements,
except this time to interact
with the sun and gentle
wind. Penumbra creates protection
from the sun—welcome
shade
amidst the summer’s heat at
Socrates Sculpture Park. While the canopy of umbrellas moves
gently with the breeze,
it creates a
mesmerizing play of shadows on the
grass beneath.
JL. Is any of the creative process deliberately left to the
element of chance in terms of the accumulation of materials,
reconstruction and composition, the use of color and the
execution in this piece and your other works in general?
JS. There are certainly different elements of chance in my
work—some more overt
than others. When I set out
to accumulate certain objects inviting a certain community to
save or donate objects or clothing for the next installation,
it’s unpredictable exactly what and
how much I will end up with.
This unknown
variable in the collection process
in turn
informs
my
creative process and of course the final outcome. There is lots
of labor intensive experimentation with these castoff materials
in my studio. I’ve found that
there’s a fine balance of
imposing a deliberate intention
onto the objects and
listening to what they
want to do intrinsically or become
by chance. Furthermore, once
the objects have been reconfigured
into a new context, the
final phase of installing the work on site is
again a
very intuitive response to form,
space, color and composition.
Frederieke
Taylor Gallery, New York
www.frederieketaylorgallery.com
|